Paresh Rawal calls Ranveer Singh's method acting process for Padmaavat 'galat tareeka'

Paresh Rawal is not a fan of Ranveer Singh's method acting process for Padmaavat 'galat tareeka': Kisi ko chaku maar doge aap. He thinks it is a wrong pattern.

Actor Ranveer Singh had revealed that getting into the skin of Alauddin Khilji in Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s Padmaavat was so intense that the character stayed with him even after the shoot was over. Is such an intense acting method favourable? Paresh Rawal does not think so, as he shared in an interview with Siddharth Kannan.

A clip of the interview surfaced on Reddit, where Paresh was seen disagreeing with the method acting process. The host told him how Ranveer shared that after the shoot of Padmaavat, he was depressed, and the character stayed with him. To this, Paresh said, “Agar aap aisa karte ho na bhaiya toh ye galat tarika hain. Aap ke andar saakshi bhaav hona chahiye. Accha mujhe ek baat bataiye ap jitna bhi daaru pee lo maa ya biwi ke palang pe jaake hi so jaate ho. Woh saakshi bhav hain na (If you follow such a process then it is wrong. You must have a witness attitude in it. Even after you have a lot of alcohol, one still goes home to their mother or their wife. That is the witness attitude, right)?”

https://www.reddit.com/r/BollyBlindsNGossip/comments/1iyoko6/paresh_rawal_on_ranveer_singhs_process/?utm_source=embedv2&utm_medium=post_embed&utm_content=whitespace&embed_host_url=https://d-18272581341199408765.ampproject.net/2502032353000/frame.html&rdt=64098

He concluded by saying, “Ye galat hain ki main role mein ghus gaya tha… toh kisi ko chaku maar doge aap (This is wrong that for a role you forget everything… so one can also stab someone like that)?

Many users on Reddit did not agree with Paresh's logic and the statement he said that both sides of the process could coexist. A user commented, “What sort of an explanation was this? I mean I get what he's trying to say that nobody should be that invested in a role once the job is done, but could've explained better.”

A second user wrote, “As much as I admire him, he is wrong because that’s not his method. Heath Ledger is one example, and Vikram from the Tamil industry is another. People have their methods for achieving the best possible performance. Hrithik Roshan once said he locked himself in a room for many days to understand the role and character and all that.”

A user called out Paresh's illogical example, and said: “Whaaat? Did Paresh bring in the comparison of sleeping in your mom's bed vs your wife's? Like what kind of comparison is that? What is even the point of what he's trying to make???”

Read Here: Paresh Rawal Defends Shah Rukh Khan For This!